병역법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On June 26, 2013, the Defendant directly received a notice of enlistment to the effect that he was enlisted in the active duty service (full time reserve service), and that he was enlisted in the 53 army located in the Busan regional military manpower office located in Suwon-gu, Busan on September 24, 2013, and that he was enlisted in the 53 army located in the Busan regional military manpower office, Busan on September 24, 2013.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Written statements prepared by the J;
1. Date of enlistment in active duty service, notification of enlistment, and application of the receipt of notification of enlistment for full time reserve service;
1. The main sentence of Article 88 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);
1. Taking into account the following circumstances with the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and other various sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading up to the Defendant to the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the execution of the sentence shall be suspended only once more than that of the Defendant’s imprisonment with prison labor for a long time than that of isolation from society for a long time, and the order of community service for a certain period of time shall be determined as ordered.
D. Unfavorable circumstances: The nature of the crime of this case that the defendant did not enter the military within three days from the date of enlistment notified without justifiable grounds, and the defendant needs to be punished strictly in consideration of the equity with other persons liable for military service who faithfully perform his duty of military service.
The defendant recognized the crime of this case.
In the future, the defendant will be able to faithfully perform military service.