When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 1, 2019, at around 07:55, the Defendant driven a C-A-hurd-purd-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic control reports, notification of the results of the drinking driving control, and report on the state of drinking drivers;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 148-2 (3) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months for the crime of attempted quasi-rape in 2018, and thus led to the drinking driving in this case. The blood alcohol concentration of the defendant was 0.176%, and the defendant was sentenced to two years of the suspended sentence for August for the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes even in 2010: Provided, That the defendant recognized the mistake thereof, and there is no record of punishment for the drunk driving, the defendant's age, occupation, personality and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the disposition.