In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

1. Defendant B is a person who was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in a female branch of Suwon District Court on August 7, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around October 18, 2012.

At around 07:20 on September 20, 201, the Defendant suffered from the first place of the Victim A (the 46 years of age) while eating together with other prisoners in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 182, Suwon-si, 182, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 182. However, the Defendant made a half of the Victim A (the 46 years of age), stating that “the other prisoners have finished meal, and the other prisoners have finished the meal,” but it was time for the Defendant, who is a higher victim’s age, to “I would turn off his horse.” The Defendant sustained the injury, such as the heat of the mouth in which the victim could not know the number of days of treatment, on his hand.

2. When the victim B (the years of age 48) and vision were found in the above date, time, place, and as seen above, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim’s hand floor, such as the breath’s breath, and breath’s breath, and the breath’s breath, and the breath’s breath and breath’s breath

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. The witness B’s legal statement (as to the defendant A)

1. Work report on workers, investigation report (suspect photographs, personal records of confinement wards, and submission of A medical records);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Defendant B’s legal statement, criminal records, and investigation reports (reports prior to and after the disposition);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Defendant B who handles concurrent crimes: The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;

1. Defendant A’s assertion of Defendant A under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the burden of litigation costs, is only defensive against B’s assault.