2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Party’s status 1) The Network H is the I Hospital operated by the Defendant on December 8, 201 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The Defendant is the operator of the Defendant Hospital and the employer of the Defendant Hospital’s medical staff. The Defendant is the Plaintiff’s wife, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F. The Defendant is the provider of the Defendant Hospital.

B. On November 11, 2011, the X-ray test confirmed a serious eromosome erode and eromosome erode (20 degrees 20 degrees erode, 10 degrees erode) on both slots, and following the Defendant hospital’s medical team’s medical team’s recommendation, the erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode (10 degrees erode), and the erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode erode (e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e. e. e.).

3) The net H’s vitality from the above hospitalization to the relocation of the instant surgery is as follows. On December 7, 201, 17:00 17:0 170/90 60 60 - 160/80 - 23:00 - 170/90 - 680 - 23:0 06:00 00 - 06/80 00 - 06: 00 160/80 00 : 06: 00 160/80 70 20: 36: 00 : 06: 00 : 36: 08: 180/90 70/90 902094) of the date from 0: 05/36: 180/360/90, 208 of the instant surgery’s blood records from Defendant hospital’s blood records at the time of this case.

C. The instant case.