except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B knife vehicles.

On July 1, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 14:20, and proceeded to the entrance of the clean village in the state where the above vehicle was parked. A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to look at the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D (78 years of age) who was seated on the right side of the above vehicle due to negligence while driving the vehicle, and did not find the victim D (78 years of age).

On July 1, 2014, the Defendant caused the victim to die by occupational negligence at a F Hospital located in the Southernnam-gun E on July 1, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the vehicles operated by the defendant are covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the defendant has agreed to do so separately with the bereaved family members of the victim, the defendant has a depth of and reflects his mistake, and various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc. recorded in the records of this case) or more.