1) The Plaintiff is a party to the dispute. Around July 2011, the Plaintiff is a company G (hereinafter referred to as “G”).

(2) Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a press company that publishes online newspaper “E”, and Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is an advertising company, online newspaper, online magazine publication business, etc. as its main business.

B. As indicated in attached Form 2, Defendant B prepared an article containing the following (hereinafter “instant article”) as the title “I”, as indicated in the instant article, and Defendant D reported the article to online newspapers E on March 29, 2019.

(hereinafter “instant report”). ① The Plaintiff’s members entered the general meeting of shareholders and obstructed the progress of the general meeting of shareholders by entering the general meeting of shareholders.

(2) The Plaintiff, rather than demanding the improvement, etc. of the wage welfare system, is serving as a member of the political issues.

(3) The Plaintiff’s filing of a problem to the president of GJ is to raise a sense of existence in connection with the political forces.

(hereinafter referred to as “Debitio part”). 【The ground for recognition” does not exist, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 8 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and the parties’ assertion to the purport of the whole pleadings.

A. Among the articles of this case, the part of the article of this case constitutes false facts, and the defendants committed tort which seriously infringes the plaintiff's honor by preparing and reporting the article of this case where the above false facts are indicated.

Therefore, the Defendants jointly and jointly compensate the Plaintiff for damages, and Defendant D and C shall take appropriate measures to restore their reputation in accordance with Article 764 of the Civil Code.