A. At around 13:40 on February 21, 2005, B is a vehicle C (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

ii)A vehicle E-Motor vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff-Motor vehicle”) in front of the signal atmosphere in the front bank, due to negligence in neglecting the duty of Jeonju, while driving a two-lane road of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1119 on the Han River basin from the Han River basin to the Seoul Han River basin.

) The back part of the Defendant vehicle was shocked with the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle and caused the Plaintiff on board the Plaintiff vehicle to suffer injury, such as the number of trees and other damage of unknown details (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and 10, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each of the corresponding items of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated monthly, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

Personal information 1) Personal data: as stated in the column for the “basic matters” in the annexed sheet for calculation of damages in attached Form 1: The urban daily wage of an ordinary worker, the number of working days until he reaches the age of 22, 3) the remaining disability, and the rate of loss of labor capacity by the type of aftermath disability (1) the rate of loss of labor capacity due to 8% due to anesthesia pain and stress disorder, and the date of the accident in this case. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 18720, Feb. 21, 2005>