A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a freight vehicle that is a freight truck.

On October 21, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 10:50 on and around October 21, 2012, and led the vehicle to proceed to the direction from the direction toward the intersection on the road in the intersection of the west-gun, North Korea. In such a case, the Defendant has a duty of care to prevent an accident and drive the vehicle by properly examining the boom.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through the intersection from the right side of the cargo vehicle of the victim B (35 years old) driving, which passes the intersection from the upper right side of the cargo vehicle of the victim B (35 years old), with due care, was shocked by the upper right side of the cargo vehicle of the above radar.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the Victim F (the 75 years of age) who was on board the said Rascing vehicle due to the above occupational negligence by the victim F (the 23:40 on October 21, 2012, and caused the death of the victim H (the 76 years of age) who was on board the said Rascing vehicle at the J Hospital located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, to the brain pressure at the G Hospital in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City on October 21, 2012. In addition, around November 21, 2012, the victim H (the 76 years of age) was on board the said Rascing vehicle at the J Hospital located in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving vehicles of E-Poter cargo vehicles.

On October 21, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 10:50 on October 21, 2012, and led to the flow from the right west to the right west at the speed of the parallel road in the parallel of the west-gun in the west-gun of the former North Korea. In such a case, the Defendant has a duty of care to take into account road conditions and enter the vehicle to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeded to the shore from the direction of the mawal by negligence, before the left side of the Mawal Transport Vehicle.