Around November 2014, the victim J, the victim W, and the victim G submitted a copy of the resolution of the revenues of the D church to the investigation and trial related to the church accounting principles for the defendant, as there are many financial problems of the D church, such as embezzlement and punishment of the executive secretary of the D church's funds.

Therefore, the defendant concluded that the acts of the above victims are to defame himself and divide the church, thereby creating a book with the content that the victims have forged or falsified copies, and submitted them to investigation agencies and courts, while knowing that they have forged or falsified copies, and had the mind to distribute them to the members of the church.

On June 14, 2015, the Defendant produced a book stating "the second reply to the meeting of the Council" in the D church located in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu (hereinafter "the book of this case") and filed an application for a provisional disposition on the account books with the competent court at the time, and filed an appeal with the competent court of Gwangju, which submitted a forged import resolution to the general meeting trial state, and filed an appeal with the competent court of Gwangju, by submitting a forged import resolution form, and filed an appeal with the competent High Court of Gwangju, and even if G rejected the lawsuit as an aiding and abetting, the Defendant filed an appeal against the forged import resolution form with the prosecutor's office of public prosecutor's office, which is currently being investigated, regardless of its rejection.

In 12 pages, “I shall inciting the scambling as if the scam was embezzled, and shall have the scambling of the scambling and have the scambling of the scambling to submit the

(b) The signature without permission before ascertaining the truth is an act beyond the deception of the members who are responsible for the division of a church, and is responsible for the division.