Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap's evidence 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, Eul evidence 2 and 3 (including serial numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the representative director Eul of the defendant company (the opening of October 1, 2010) supplied double locks and Mas, etc. to D who engages in recycling business from 209 to 2010; the defendant company's 200 and 100 and 300, 300, 196, 200, 300 and 19, 30,000,000 won and 60,000,000 won and 30,000,000 won and 10,000,000 won and 10,000 won and 3,000,000 won and 10,000 won and 3,000,00 won.