If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. 절도 피고인은 2012. 11. 23. 15:00경 창원시 마산회원구 B아파트 마동 407호 피해자 C의 주거지 내에서, 피해자가 회사에 출근하여 집에 아무도 없는 것을 기화로 그 집안에 있던 피해자 소유의 시가 400,000원 상당의 MCM제품 가방 1점과 시가 미상의 앵글부츠 신발 1켤레, 시가 39,000원 상당의 스키니진 의류 1점, 시가 미상의 긴팔티셔츠 1점, 시가 20,000원 상당의 겨울용 반바지 1점, 시가 49,000원 상당의 숄 1점, 시가 19,000원 상당의 화장품(아이오페) 1개, 시가 미상의 향수(안나수이 돌리걸) 1병, 신한은행 체크카드 1장을 가지고 피해자의 집을 나와 절취하였다.

2. Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act violation Defendant purchased 1 kind of tobacco in E convenience stores located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the market price of which is 25,000 won or more, and made payment by presenting the above 3th card to the new bank of the above C, and acquired 1 kind of tobacco.

3. On November 29, 2012, the Defendant knows that around 16:00 on November 29, 2012, the Victim F erroneously remitted KRW 4,182,00 to his/her new bank account (G).

Nevertheless, around November 29, 2012, the Defendant embezzled an amount equivalent to the above amount by withdrawing and using all the money in his/her own deposit account at the I convenience store located in Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si on November 29, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the details of card use);

1. Relevant Articles 329, 347 (1) and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, and selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2)1.