A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

1. Defendant A, at around 08:30 on April 18, 2018, 2018, marbling the victim FF (38 years old) who was seated in the mar B, while drinking together with a daily drinking at the “E” restaurant located in the Daesung-gu U.S. P., and his/her day-to-day, he/she shall walk the victim F (38 years old) and his/her day-to-day with his/her day-to-day, leading the victim who tried to leave the said restaurant, leading him/her to the breath of his/her arms, breath of the victim’s arms, and breath of the victim’s hand at two consecutive times, and then “Isk-to-day with his/her hand knick and breath of it.

“In doing so, the victim’s breath was led to a breath’s breath, and the victim was injured by several parts of the arms in need of medical treatment for about 14 days, such as salt, tension, etc.

2. On April 18, 2018, Defendant B tried to arrest Defendant B’s police officers, who were affiliated with the Daejeon Pream Station G District Police Station G District, called upon receiving the above notification of the assault case, while drinking alcohol with the said A around 08:45 on April 18, 2018, and tried to arrest Defendant B under suspicion of assault, and whether “influents are arrested,” and “influents are arrested;

The reason why we see why we had caused the Mason’s mistake, we could not arrest A while blocking and pushing ahead of H, and H continued to have kicked the son’s hand, knife, knife and knife A’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. Photographs of damage (Evidence 4,10);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment;

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant A is identical to the defendant.