However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 25, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the Victim C (60) and the Victim C (60) on the ground that the Defendant’s conduct scam scambling music with a cellular phone in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu on April 13:15, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Decision on the type of sentencing guidelines recommended: The scope of recommendations that no person is subject to the special sentencing of Category 1 (General Violence): Imprisonment with prison labor for two months or ten months or more (basic areas): Whether the person is subject to the serious sentencing - whether the person is subject to a suspended sentence of reflectness: The reasons for the suspended sentence are comprehensively compared and assessed (the choice of a suspended sentence) - The reasons for the suspended sentence are comprehensively compared and assessed (the choice of a suspended sentence): No affirmative reason for general consideration - No effort is made to recover damage: contingent crimes, serious reflectness;

2. Since additional consideration is made to the Defendant and repeated crimes related to heavy and small violence, it is necessary to impose the observation of protection to prevent recurrence.

3. Four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a decision of sentence, one year of suspended sentence, and one year of observation of protection;