When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and the victim B ( South, 52 years old) are not aware of each other. The victim is the owner of C Spopo-si vehicle.

On July 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) displayed the smartphone light on the victim’s C Ssponsed in front of the ‘Esponsing D’ located on the street at the time of the Government around 04:20 on July 11, 2017; (b) attempted to steal the damaged vehicle’s internal object by displaying the inside of the damaged vehicle; (c) but (d) failed to bring the victim’s knife and bring the victim into an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of black stay images);

1. Article 342 of the Criminal Act and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are against the defendant's wrong judgment, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, and other factors such as the situation before and after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, etc. shall be taken into consideration to determine the punishment as ordered.