However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 13, 2017, around 02:10, the Defendant: (a) reported that he was a taxi engineer and a Si guard on the front side of the Seocheon-si B, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul District Police Station CridgeD affiliated with the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul District Police Station, sent to the victim his bath, and assaulted the chest of the above police officer on one occasion.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (i.e., interference with the performance of official duties) (i., a person subject to special sentencing] [Determination of sentence] under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s assaulting the police in the course of performing official duties, the nature of the crime is not good, and the Defendant’s indictment of suspension of indictment is taken as a crime related to violence, each of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s wrongness, and the degree of assault is relatively minor, etc., shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions specified in the argument of the instant case.