However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2012. 11. 18. 04:45경 광주 북구 B 주점에서 음주 소란 등으로 신고를 받고 출동한 광주북부경찰서 C파출소 112 순찰 근무자 경사 D이 피고인에게 더 이상 소란을 피우지 말고 귀가할 것을 종용하자 위 D에게 "씹할놈아, 야 거지 새끼야, 좃밥들아, 짭새새끼야"등의 욕설하고 경사 D의 배를 피고인의 배로 10여회 미는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement statement made to D by the police;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is that the defendant has committed the instant crime even if he/she has repeatedly committed violent crimes in the last ten years and has been sentenced to suspended sentence and a fine. In this case, the sentence of imprisonment shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that it is difficult to deem the degree of violence to be serious.