손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
The defendant.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” (former trade name: H) Ha six parallels in the second and third parallels in the third parallels in the third parallels in the third parallels in the court of appeal (Seoul High Court 2016No147) shall be deemed to be “Plaintiffs (former trade name: H)”; and (b) the court of appeal (Seoul High Court 2016No147), which is continuing to be in the court of appeal (Seoul High Court 2016No147) as of the date of the appeal by the prosecutor, respectively; and (c) the part of them is as described
2. In addition to the facts found in the relevant criminal judgment, the defendant asserted that the part of the judgment of the court of first instance used was damaged to the plaintiff et al. by using KRW 14,747,753 with the plaintiff's corporate card that was stolen from May 2012 to February 2015, and KRW 50,794,167 with the corporation card of the stolen corporation E, and KRW 50,797 with KRW 50,794,167. As long as the plaintiff acquired the damage claim equivalent to the above KRW 50,794,167 with the damage claim of KRW 50,541,920 with the damage claim due to the embezzlement, the defendant shall pay the plaintiff a total sum of KRW 65,541,920 with KRW 15,16,37 through 43, and KRW 93, the testimony or testimony of the witness, and the following facts are acknowledged according to the purport of the whole testimony and testimony.
(A) The defendant may use monthly limits of KRW 3 million to KRW 4 million in relation to the business of the plaintiff from the plaintiff as a corporate card P, Q, and Korean card R
(i) The period of use is different;
(1) If the payment was made, 9 copies of the corporate card E Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s parent company (hereinafter referred to as “instant corporate card”) for convenience.
) The sum of KRW 65,531,920 (=Plaintiff 14,747,753) as shown in attached Table 3 from March 21, 2012 to February 28, 2015, without the approval of the manager, after acquiring the Company’s treasury by taking it out from the Company’s treasury.