However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:55 on February 4, 2016, the Defendant, on the ground that: (a) the victim E belonging to the Jinju Police Station D District in the Jinju Police Station D, who was called up after having received a report of 112 at C Garan B B, and F, asked the Defendant for the reasons why he did not pay the Defendant’s drinking value; (b) the Defendant, among the four other parties, should not pay for the victims “Chewing flasium, kins, and nick,” among the four other parties in the main place business G;

In this sense, the victims were openly insultingd by referring to the large arbitra, Chewing argue, arbitra.”

2. At around 01:15 on February 4, 2016, the Defendant damaged public goods by taking the Defendant’s personal information, etc. into consideration at the D District District of Jinju Police Station D, Jinju, 2016, the Defendant: (a) saw that the said E was able to ask the Defendant about the personal information, etc.; (b) she was able to look at only two years of imprisonment with labor; (c) she was able to fluore E with a large amount of flusium, she was flusium, she was flusium, and she was flusium, which was installed at the D District District of the said District Office, and damaged the Defendant by taking the Defendant’s personal information on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the object managed by the above district group as a public worker, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, F, and E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to public goods) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order and the order to attend lectures has the record of being punished three times for the same crime, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though he was punished for one of them, and each of the crimes of this case was committed at the same time, although the defendant's responsibility is not less and less.