However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with Bsch Rexroth, in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On April 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the said passenger vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.086% with blood alcohol level around 18:20, the Defendant driven the said passenger vehicle at a speed that would not be known depending on the two-lanes in front of the Gyeonggi Winter-si.

Since there are frequent traffic of vehicles at the same time, there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle, and by accurately manipulating the operation and the steering gear of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the influence of alcohol and failed to properly see the front door, and did not find the victim D(64 years old)’s rocketing car in the front line for the purpose of the signal signal, and did not find the victim’s D(64 years old)’s rocketing car in the front line of the passenger vehicle. The part of the victim’s vehicle was the front part of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence.

2. On July 3, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 700,000 won of a fine for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the District Court of Jung-gu on July 3, 2009, and on the 24th of the same month, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 70,000 won of a fine for the same crime at the same court

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in paragraph (1), driven B Cost Corbeon in the state of alcohol 0.086% in the section of about 4 km from the front of the restaurant in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the summer-si, Haakamamamamamamb, Haak-si to the front of the city of the same city.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D. D.