A. At around 05:00 on October 1, 2012, the Defendant discovered the victim C’s 50,000 won of the market price of the Libya, which was set up in front of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and stolen the gaps that led to the negligence of monitoring around.

B. On October 1, 2012, around 05:20 on October 1, 2012, the Defendant, at the construction site of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building and loaded 20,000 won of the total market value of sate lease materials (a) x 120 cm in length x 15 cm in length x 85 cm in length x 65 cm in length x 5 cm in length x 65 cm in length x 5 cm in length), and stolen 45 goppy (a 95 cm in length x 5 cm in length x 5 cm in length) in a stolen satek, such as the preceding paragraph.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant was indicted for committing larceny from July 31, 2012 to May 10, 2013, and was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Southern District Court on July 4, 2013, and was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor in the Seoul Southern District Court on September 27, 2013, and was dismissed by the Supreme Court on November 15, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

According to the above facts, the facts charged in this case, which became final and conclusive, and committed prior to the pronouncement of the judgment, are considered both the means and methods of the crime, the period of the crime, and the criminal records of the defendant. Thus, the facts charged in this case before the judgment is related to the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which was final and conclusive, and the facts charged in this case before the judgment

Therefore, the effect of the above final judgment is to affect the facts charged in this case, which is related to the relation of a single comprehensive crime, and eventually, this part of the facts charged falls under the time the final judgment is made, and thus, the above facts charged is acquitted.