교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Poter Cargo Vehicles B.
On March 19, 2014, the defendant, at around 19:07, driven the above vehicle and had the 17th road in the direction of the hill branch in the direction of the hill branch of the hill 17th road on the side of the hill 1 road.
Since there is a place where the yellow line is installed, there was a duty of care to safely operate the car line with the driver's duty of care not exceeding the central line.
Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in the course of running a central line with the central line, and the defendant was faced with the hand room of the victim C (Woo, 74 years old) who was pushed in the edge of the road in the opposite part of the marine, and caused the shock, so that the victim would go beyond the lower course.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the occupational negligence above, such as less than six weeks in detail, cerebral brain and cerebral cerebral ties that require at least six weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. Written statements of D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each medical certificate and general opinion;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 3(1) and (2) proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] is that there is no basic field [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind]. The defendant is covered by comprehensive insurance for the motor vehicle driving the motor vehicle, and the defendant has deposited five million won for the victim, but it is recognized that the crime of the crime of this case in which the defendant suffered bodily injury by negligence that intrudes the central line, and that the defendant did not properly recover from the damage, such as the defendant did not agree with the victim even though the victim suffered serious bodily injury, and that the age, character and conduct of the defendant has not been fulfilled.