beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.11 2014고단3983

상표법위반

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is a person who operates a household product manufacturing plant, and Defendant A and Defendant B are working as an employee in the above plant.

피고인들은 D와 공모하여 2014. 6. 17.경 서울 성북구 E 2층에 있는 피고인 D가 운영하는 공장에서, 미싱기 2대, 프레스 1대 등을 설치하고, D가 가품 가죽을 재단하면, 피고인 A, 피고인 B은 접착제를 이용하여 지갑을 조립하고 장식물을 부착하는 방법으로 정당한 권한 없이 대한민국 특허청에 등록된 ‘루이비똥(LOUIS VUITTON, 등록번호 제0059471호, 제0109060호)’, ‘샤넬(CHANEL, 등록번호 제0071324호, 제0309448호)’, ‘구찌(GUCCI, 등록번호 제0132874호)’ 상표와 동일한 상표를 부착한 가품 루이비똥, 샤넬, 구찌 지갑을 제조하고, D는 위와 같은 방법으로 제조한 가품 루이비똥 반지갑 135개를 제조하여 판매 목적으로 보관한 것을 비롯하여 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 총 3,695개의 가품 및 원단 등을 판매하거나 완제품 제조에 사용할 목적으로 보관하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D and infringed the trademark rights of the above trademark right holder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect regarding D;

1. Seizure records;

1. The original trademark register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (workplaces and product photographs of sites violating the Trademark Act);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 93 of the Trademark Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (limited to each registered trademark);

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (trades violating the Trademark Act by type of registered trademark due to one custody act).

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of the community service order: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations].