beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.07.17 2014나105620

건물명도

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "T Taean Golf Host Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "T Taean Pelel Co., Ltd.") and "T Taean Pelk Pelk Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "T Taean Pelk Pel")," "F," "D et al., 16" and "F, 3, 4 through 6, 9, 10, 15, 5, 17, 6, 1, 6, 7, 7, 7, 20, 7, 8, 20, 20, 4, 7, 91, and 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 105, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 17, 11, 5, 100, 10, 10,000, 15,00.

1) The Defendant A borrowed KRW 100,000,000 from the Defendant’s Intervenor and paid the remainder of KRW 100,000 to the Defendant’s Intervenor. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact of the above loan and payment.

"In the fourth page, the removal was made" in the 15th page.

“Released”

(However, in the case of Defendant A, the seller requested the Intervenor to repurchase in accordance with the agreement that allows the buyer to request the Intervenor to repurchase under certain conditions in accordance with Article 19(6) of the sales contract in this case. The evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 in the fourth 17 is “Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3”, “7 evidence” in the first 7th 7th 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 19, “if the buyer rescinded or requested the repurchase,” respectively, “if the buyer cancels or requested the repurchase thereof,” and “in the fourth 15th 4th 15th 5th 5th 5th 15th 5th 5th 5th 1008” and “in the first 1st 1st 6th 1st 1st 2008”.