명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged by the Defendant, around 17:50 on June 5, 2013, at the restaurant of the D company located in Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “H is a man other than the husband, and H is playing in the house, even though he does not fall short of the victim’s intellectual ability. He is playing in the house, and even though he does not fall short of the victim’s intellectual ability, H is playing in the house, and H is playing in the house, and H is less.”
2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim submitted a written agreement on October 19, 2014 and expressed his/her intent not to be punished against the defendant, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.