Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On April 6, 2017, the Defendant, within the police box located in Busan Yagu C, around 20:18, and on May 24, 2016, entered the case as a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the revocation column of the official box) in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the revocation column of the official box) on April 24, 2016.

At present, there is no more than 10 minutes of the trial, such as “Abrupted, discarded, and thrown down all the court of the Republic of Korea,” “Abrupted three years of the trial, with all the strings, with all the strings, with all the strings, and attempted to assault E by a police box of the Republic of Korea,” and scrupted and scrupted by very rough words and conducts for about 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statements of E and F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Although the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no act recorded in the facts charged, the defendant and his defense counsel did not have committed any act as stated in the facts charged. However, in full view of each evidence presented in the summary of the evidence above, it is sufficient to find the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Optional to the punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the costs of lawsuit;