On July 24, 2018, at around 21:50, the Defendant: (a) followed the victim C (a) returning home on the road located in Jeju-si B on July 24, 2018; (b) “I am “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.

“In doing so, she did not commit rape by cutting the victim’s timber, cutting the victim’s breath, she tried to rape the victim, but did not bring about the wind that is discovered by the mathr, and the victim did not have the intent to commit the attempted crime, and the victim did so by cutting the breath of the credit prop which requires approximately 6 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C (alias) and D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C (tentative name);

1. Investigation report (related to CCTV analysis by a suspect or a ship);

1. On-site reports on results of field identification and genetic assessment reports;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of CCTV images, on-the-spot photographs, victim-to-face photographs, and victim-to-face photographs, the Defendant recognized that the Defendant inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim at the time and place recorded in the facts of the crime in his/her judgment. However, at the time, the Defendant claimed to the effect that, after doing so, he/she did not run frightly to the victim, while she frightly frighted with female frighten in a very rough weather state, he/she did not run frightly, but attempted to rape the victim. However, in full view of the following circumstances recognized by the evidence in its holding, the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that he/she inflicted an assault on the victim with his/her intent to rape the victim.