A. Taking into account the fact that there is no dispute between the parties to the lease amount, the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and 4-1 (the document of rent, the document of rent, and the document of rent that the defendant recognized the authenticity was revoked on the third date for pleading, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the recognition of the establishment was contrary to the truth and due to mistake, the above revocation is not effective), and Nos. 4-2 (the document of rent, the document of rent, and the document of rent, the document of rent, and the document of rent, are identical with the document No. 4-1 or the document No. 4-2 (the document of rent, the document of rent, the document of rent, the document of rent, the document of rent, the document of rent, the document of rent, and the document of rent, the document of rent, and the document of rent, even if being compared with the document of rent, are shown as if it were compared with the document of rent No. 1, 200,000 won, the document of evidence No. 3

(1) The loan amount of KRW 30,00, KRW 300, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 30,000 per annum on July 28, 2014 ¡À 30,000 per annum on December 31, 2014 ¡À60, KRW 30,000 per annum on July 30, 200, KRW 00, KRW 300, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 300, KRW 400 on July 30, 2014 ¡À60, KRW 300, KRW 300,00 on July 30, 200, KRW 300, KRW 300,000 on ± 12 months ± 10,005, KRW 300 on May 31, 2014.