2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected his mistake, the Defendant appears to have recovered part of the damage, and the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea.

However, the crime of this case is committed by embezzlement of money in excess of KRW 130 million by deceiving the victims in Vietnam or by deceiving the victims in the course of short-term borrowing, etc., and thus, in light of the method and content of the crime, and the number of victims, etc., the crime was committed very poor and is very serious, and the damage was not recovered. The defendant did not receive any letter from the victims, and the defendant's age, career, sex, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are the same as the various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, and the sentencing of similar cases, such as the following circumstances, it cannot be deemed that the court below's punishment against the defendant is unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.