Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the frauds stated in the attached list of crimes No. 2.

[criminal record] On December 23, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on December 23, 201 and the above judgment was finalized on December 31, 2010.

[2] The Defendant, from around April 2008, operated a restaurant with the name of “H” in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E (the Gu's point), Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F (the first point), and Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G (Gu's point) from around December 2004, as the restaurant sales decreased due to e-mail, the Defendant was unable to dismiss the deficit of 3 to 500 million won every month from the Hanman on December 2007, and the operation of the restaurant became worse on September 23, 2008, as the demonstration opposing the import of U.S. beef continues to increase, and eventually, around September 23, 2008, the operation of the restaurant became worse.

In the process, the Defendant asked I to seek money from any other person at a discount of the bill number and face value of the bill number issued by I, and I immediately after the request, to the L restaurant operated by the victim K located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and then deliver the above promissory note to the victim as above, and “I will make settlement on the bill at a discount of the bill, without any frame, at the payment date of the bill.”

“.....”

However, as seen above, Defendant 1 did not have any intent or ability to make a normal settlement of the amount of the promissory note even if I accepted a discount from the injured party, because the financial situation of the financial institution ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever

Nevertheless, the defendant may be aware of such circumstances.