When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, around 17:15 on 03.03. 06. 06. 17:17. 06. 06. 17. 06. 1. on the roads in front of D stores in Busan, the Defendant: (a) stated that the drunk fluor was given one; and (b) the F-verification fluor, which was parked there, was low to 125C fluor, and damaged the fluor of the victim E, thereby damaging the fluor; and (c) stated that the f. 7.330,000 won of the f. f.

It has been damaged to be reasonable.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.