A, C, and D shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

The Defendants respectively.

1. Defendants A, B, and E co-principaled Defendants were F members of the company, and around 07:50 on July 15, 2013, Defendants A, B, and E had a dispute with other employees, seeking to prevent the movement of workers I belonging to the said company, before the main office of H Co., Ltd. located in G on July 15, 2013.

In the process, Defendant A was able to take the face of the victim J (the age of 43) who is an employee of the above company two times by drinking, and Defendant B took the face of the victim one time by drinking. Defendant B took the face of the victim one time by drinking, and E took the head of the victim.

As a result, the Defendants, in collaboration with E, suffered injury to the victim, such as a multi-faceted crypology and diagnosis that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct had the head of the Victim K (the age of 45) who was disputing the employees of the said company for the same reason at the time, at the same place, and had the victim suffered bodily injury, such as scam and scam for about two weeks in need of medical treatment.

3. Defendant C’s sole criminal conduct committed an injury to the victim, following the victim L (the victim’s age 49)’s neck, which was disputed with his employees on the same ground at the time, at the above time, at the same place, and thereafter, the victim suffered an injury, such as a stroke, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

4. Defendant D’s sole criminal conduct committed an injury on the part of the victim M(37 years of age) with the employees belonging to the said company for the same reason at the time, at the same place, while disputing the above company’s employees for the same reason, the victim’s celbane, thereby pushing the victim with approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant D’s legal statement

1. Part of the police interrogation protocol of the Defendants and E

1. Each police statement of the N, L, K, and M;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Defendant B: Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.