In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

around 17:00 on March 22, 2018, the Defendants found the victim F (38 tax) who is the representative of the “E” working for the Defendants in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu 1’s service, and requested the Defendants to talk about the violation of the prohibition of concurrent operation. The Defendants discovered the document files stating the names of the members of the “E” at the place of the office, and prevented the Defendants from participating in the photographing them out of the office, and bring them out of the office with a strong power by saving the body of the victims from two arms. Defendant B sent the body of the victims to the outside of the office, and Defendant A made it difficult for the victims to catch out of the office so that they would not get out of the office and let the victims get out of the office so that they could not get out of the office.

As a result, the defendants jointly put the victim into a medical examination for approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A letter of diagnosis of injury in the F;

1. Two on-site CCTV CDs (the Defendants asserted that their actions constitute legitimate acts, but the Defendants’ actions cannot be seen as being reasonable or complementary to their means and methods, and thus, the above assertion is rejected).

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62 of the Criminal Act.