사기등
Defendant - [2017 Highest 7527] Each fraud set forth in [1-3] No. 1 to No. 3 of the List of Offenses Attached to the Case, and each fraud.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On July 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, two years of suspended execution, and one million won of fine at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2017, and is currently in the grace period.
around 10:11 on August 1, 2017, the Defendant up to 2017, posted a letter, “Pop-up Pool,” “D,” and reported to and contacted the victim E, who first sent money, at the Defendant’s residence in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and then sent money.”
“A false representation was made.”
However, the facts are that the defendant did not have a cleaning machine, and there was no intention or ability to sell the cleaning machine even if he did not receive money from the damaged party because he did not have a cleaning machine and required living expenses.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 165,00 from the victim to the F bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant as the sales proceeds for the same day from the victim, and received KRW 1,205,00 from June 25, 2017 to August 6, 2017, including the transfer of KRW 1,205,00 from the victim 7 in the same manner as the sale proceeds in the same manner as the previous crime list (1) in the same manner as the previous crime list.
On August 19, 2017, the Defendant posted a false statement on the part of the Defendant, stating that “Around August 19, 2017, the Defendant sold a habitor to Internet D, thereby making a false statement on the part of the victim H, who reported and contacted the statement, stating that “Absing KRW 135,000 to transfer KRW 135,00,00,” and sending it to the victim H.
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a habitor and posted a false article on his own mind in preparation of living expenses, so even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the habiter.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and his deceivings the victim, 135,000 won under the name of the F Bank account (J) in the name of the defendant's female-friendly job offering I on the same day from the victim.