However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person working for one-time, and the victim B (54) is a C Park custodian in C Park, and the defendant and the victim are not aware of each other.

The Defendant, around April 8, 2016, 23:50 on April 23:50, 2016, she was working together with the victim in the E alcohol house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was drinking together with the victim, she would become the victim’s house.

The victim called "humping", and the victim called "humping and drinking alcohol", on the ground that the victim called "humping and drinking alcohol", the victim's face was 4 to 5 times per own drinking, and the victim's entrance was based on the victim's proposal, so that the victim suffered injury in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing injury photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order did not result in assaulting a victim who was drinking together, without any particular reason, and thereby causing injury to the victim, and did not recover damage for the victim.

The defendant has been punished for a 15-time violent crime.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the degree of injury of the victim, motive for the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc.