beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.29 2014가단5295740

양수금

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: 112,822,700 won and 50,000,000 won among them, from September 12, 1996 to January 4, 200

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A

(a) Indication of claims: Each description of the causes for claims and the changed causes of claims; and

(b) Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers) and Eul evidence No. 1 as to the claims against the defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties listed in the separate sheet No. 1 as the heir of the deceased H, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the grounds for the claim and the changed grounds for the claim; and (b) the designated parties listed in the separate sheet No. 1 as the heir of the deceased H, filed a report on the inheritance-type approval under the Daejeon District Court 2005Mo-Ma43, March 30

Therefore, the Defendant (Appointed Party) B and the appointed parties are jointly and severally liable to pay 18,803,783 won and 8,33,333 won and 20% per annum from September 12, 1996 to January 4, 200, and 18% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant (Appointed Party) B and the appointed parties is with merit.