When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 15, 2017, around 14:30, the Defendant: (a) around the main point of the operation of the Victim C (Fel, 60 years old); (b) at around 14:30 on August 15, 2017, the Defendant prevented the Defendant from entering and leaving the Defendant by speaking to the effect that the Defendant “Murra” was removed; and (c) there was a number of empty bottles, which are dangerous things in the neighborhood, and (d) caused the death and death of the victim; and (d) the Defendant laid down the said small-scale bottle on the floor.

2. On August 15, 2017, around the above main point, the Defendant: (a) went to the above main point, and (b) went to the effect that the victim would not open the doors; (c) and (d) the victim would put the empty house, which is an object dangerous to the head of the household, and (d) the victim would go to the correctional institution.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the photograph of each case

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the defendant was not the victim and was the victim, but was the victim at the outside of the main office operated by the victim, and the victim did not want to be punished against the defendant, shall be determined by the sentence as per the order, taking into account all the factors of sentencing indicated in the record.