However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Defendant

A is a person who has been engaged in the keeping of the real estate owned by a clan while serving as the representative of the clan E (hereinafter referred to as the "family member"), and the defendant B is a person who has served as the general secretary of the clan.

The Defendants, in fact, wished to prepare minutes of the minutes and sell the land owned by the clan to F without going through a resolution of the general meeting of the clan that did not go through the resolution of the general meeting of the clan.

Defendant

B prepared a clan protocol, clan minutes, the literature rules, and the literature minutes necessary to sell the land owned by the clan and signed and sealed by the members of the clan, and the defendant A signed and sealed the above documents and affixed a seal certificate for real estate sale and affixed it to the confirmation letter, and affixed a seal to the power of attorney and the sales contract, etc.

1. A crime on March 18, 2009;

A. The Defendants entered in the public electronic records, etc., made an application for the registration of ownership transfer to F in fact on the ground of sale on March 3, 2009, by attaching the minutes of the door-to-door general meeting as if there was a clan general meeting with the content that the Defendants would dispose of the forest owned by the clan in the public electronic records, etc., from the registration division of the Cheongju District Court located in Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and the fact that they did not intend to dispose of the forest owned by the clan G in the Chungcheongbuk-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, 209.

Accordingly, the registration official who is not aware of the fact that he is not aware of the fact was computerized in the land register of the above real estate so that the ownership transfer registration based on the sale on March 3, 2009 has been made in F future.

In this way, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to a public official to record false facts in the land register which is the same electronic record as the original copy of a notarial deed.

(b).