(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. August 8, 2016

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 6, 11, 12 to 16:

On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant stating that the lease term between April 8, 2015 and April 8, 2017, the lease deposit is KRW 30 million for the lease deposit, and the monthly rent is KRW 950,000 for the real estate indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “lease object”).

B. On April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff delivered the instant leased object to the Defendant, and the Defendant paid KRW 25 million out of the instant lease deposit to the Plaintiff on the same day.

C. The Defendant paid KRW 5 million out of KRW 30 million to May 8, 2015, but did not pay the lease deposit.

However, in the object of the lease of this case, in order to put the location of this case into the site and individually turn out, the location of the room, main room, tweet, tweet, and 4 location was integrated into one place (hereinafter “the location of this case”), and the location of the room, main room, tweet, and wall 4 location was integrated into one place.

E. (1) The plaintiff and the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff as Seoul East Eastern District Court 2015Gahap2438, and the above court rendered a judgment on December 18, 2015, stating that "(1) water is found in the lake house house located on the main bank of the leased object of this case and it is difficult to deem the head of this case to the extent that the use of the leased object of this case does not interfere with the use of the leased object of this case." (2) The plaintiff accepted the house house house house located on the main bank of the leased object of this case and dismissed the defendant's remaining claims."

(2) The defendant.