매매대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The text of the judgment of the court of first instance is set forth.
1. The reasons for this Court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows, except for the addition of the following between the six pages 11 and 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is like the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main
In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 7 through 10 (including each number), Eul evidence 1, the plaintiff received a seizure and collection order of wage claim against the defendant as of December 3, 2014, under the Seoul Central District Court 2014TTT 33246, with the execution bond of the above purchase-price claim, and according to the above collection order, the company of this case paid KRW 209,50,000 to the plaintiff on March 9, 2015. Accordingly, according to the above collection order, the plaintiff reduced the claim of this case as stated in the column of the above claim. Accordingly, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff KRW 1,654,253,2595, among them, and KRW 1,653,750,00,000 calculated with the annual rate of 20% from August 3, 2014.
2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.
However, Article 1 of the decision of the court of first instance was changed by the reduction of the plaintiff's request in the trial, and it is so decided as per Disposition.