A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for two years and six months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

The Defendants revised part of the facts charged to the extent that it does not affect the Defendants’ exercise of defense rights.

Defendant

B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for injury on July 15, 2015 and one year of suspended execution on July 23, 2015, and the judgment was finalized on July 23, 2015 as to the record of the crime in the facts charged, stating that “Defendant B was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor on September 14, 2017, due to the violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, etc. at the Suwon Friwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 21, 2017.” However, according to the record of evidence evidence Nos. 3, 209, 302 through 304, 331, and 342, the above judgment was finalized on July 23, 2015 due to Defendant B’s injury, etc., while the crime of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, etc. was established between September 30, 2011 and September 23, 2014.

Thus, it is clear that all of the criminal facts acknowledged against Defendant B fall under the case where the judgment below became final and conclusive and the crime of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act can be judged concurrently.

Therefore, ex officio, Article 37 of the Criminal Code on Defendant B recognizes the criminal records that form the basis of concurrent crimes after the latter Article 37.

On September 14, 2017, after being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Suwon Franchi, the judgment was finalized on November 21, 2017.

Defendant

B is a person who operates entertainment points in the name of “D” and “E” on the fourth floor of the C building in Silung-si, and Defendant A is the head of the business of each of the above main points, and the above building was a place where the F Ngg is a “G” where the Fgggg is residing on the sixth floor.

On January 21, 2012, the Defendants: (a) purchased fire insurance in the above building as a result of the difficulty in the business of each of the above main points in the office located on the fourth floor of the above building; and (b) attempted to acquire insurance money by causing fire to the above building; and (c) Defendant B was the insured and the contracting party at the above office around February 21, 2012.