A. The facts of recognition 1) E is a F SP car on November 25, 2012 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 19:55 on November 25, 2012

2) On the other hand, the plaintiff 2 is the wife of the plaintiff 2, and the plaintiff 3 and D are the children of the plaintiff 2, and the defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant 1. The defendant 2 is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the motor vehicle. The plaintiff 2 is the wife of the plaintiff 2, and the plaintiff 3 and D are the children of the plaintiff 2, and the defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant 1.

【Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy Facts, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 2 and 4 (including branch numbers, if any); hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability is limited, however, in light of the fact that the intersection in this case is an intersection without any special restriction on the U.S. driver's U.S. driver's U.S., and that the plaintiff A can see the vehicle left left and left, the driver's U.S. driver's U.S. has the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle for the driver's U.S. driver's U.S. driver's U.S., and the driver's negligence in this case contributed to the occurrence and expansion of this case, the defendant's responsibility is limited to 90%

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed table of calculation of damages shall be the same as each corresponding item, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be monthly.