대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case mentioned in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts to be dried;
A. On December 11, 2012, “No. 12, 2012” of the first instance judgment No. 3, No. 17 and No. 41, respectively. B. On December 11, 2012, “No. 12” of the first instance judgment No. 6, “No. 12” of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “No. 12, No. 12.” (C. 4, No. 7, and No. 11) of the first instance judgment are as follows. (B) The first instance judgment No. 4, No. 7, and No. 11 of the second instance judgment No. 7, the new owner of the Plaintiff and E commercial building, and the new owner of E commercial building; (b) the details and preparation process of the agreement between the Plaintiff and E commercial building lessees; and (c) the Plaintiff and E commercial building lessees prepared a comprehensive abstract lease agreement with the Plaintiff and E commercial building lessees to address various issues facing with them; and (d) the Plaintiff 100 and C00.
Therefore, Defendant C’s defense is reasonable.
C. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is without merit.
“”
3. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.