소유권이전등기
1. Of each relevant real estate listed in the Schedule 3,
A. Defendant L is respectively assigned to J and K by the succeeding Intervenor A and B.
According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including each number), the facts of the cause of the claim and the changed cause of the claim can be recognized.
Therefore, among the pertinent real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3, Defendant L is obligated to pay the respective share of 0.425/178 to Plaintiff A and B, to Plaintiff J and K as to the share of 0.425/178, to Plaintiff C as to the share of 0.85/174; Defendant N,O, and P as to the share of 1.7/1594; Defendant D, and E as to the share of 1.7/159462; Plaintiff D and E; Defendant R as to the share of 4.25/248052; Defendant Q as to the share of 0.85/248052; Defendant Q as to the share of 0.85/2480; Defendant U as to the share of 0.425/17718; and Defendant C as to the share of 1718/178; and Defendant C as to the share of 4.71/178.18.
Plaintiff
A and B are persons who are not owners of the relevant real estate listed in the attached Table 2 as of the closing date of the pleadings of this case. Thus, the claims against the plaintiff A and B against the defendant are without merit.
Plaintiff
C’s claim against Defendant M, N,O, and P, Plaintiff D, and E’s claim against Defendant R, Q, and U, Plaintiff F, and G’s claim against Defendant S, Plaintiff H and I’s claim against Defendant C, and Plaintiff H and I’s claim against Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff J and K’s claim against Defendant L for reasons. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.