If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Defendant

A is a person who operates Lestop in the name of "E" in Pakistan, and Defendant B is a business owner of the said Lestop, subject to the punishment of Defendant A.

1. The Defendant: (a) on October 2012, when the Victim F, a creditor of loan equivalent to KRW 300 million against the Defendant, seized corporeal movables of the said Lestop on the victim’s cell phone; (b) on November 9, 2012, the Defendant: “I have the right to unsatisfy string me soon string me at the time of locking. All the new walls,” and on November 10, 200:17, “I believe Fmang and G team leader, but she was believed, and died. I returned to the Plaintiff at the auction expense on the daily day, return the text messages to the Plaintiff, and let the Defendant send the text messages to the Victim during the period from November 2012 to December 13, 2012 by means of an unsatisfy statement, even if Frangy and criminal litigation.”

2. On November 20, 2012, Defendant B accused all of Company F, I, and his wife in Yangcheon-gu, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, No. 7, No. 337, Dong-dong, 205, Dong-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, against the police.

After lending money to a person operating a large Lestop, it was seized and seized, and then managed directly by taking out the family after taking out the Lestop, and then collecting the sales from the business to the bank and the card company, and making the employees to close the place of business after taking out three materials cooling materials and cooling materials to be operated by his/her family members.

We received a written accusation to the police station because it is not possible to bring an accusation to the police station for the right to life.

The thief that they have stolen is immediately a thief.