When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 30, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of Daejeon Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and was under the influence of alcohol.

D Posman E, who was a patroler belonging to the Rabs, had a weak ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol, interfered with the police officer’s legitimate public duties. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, she took a bath, such as “har fe. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

At this time, the F, who was dispatched to the site, shall be deemed to have been employed by the Defendant.

The police officer interfered with the legitimate official duties of the police officer by putting a balbbbbbling, etc., one time, when she takes a bath, such as Chewing franchis.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of writing E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (Selection of penalty)

1. Reduction of mental and physical drugs: Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentence shall be determined as per the order, in consideration of the fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized and that E wishes the Defendant’s prior domicile, etc.