beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.04.14 2015고단364

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2015 Highest 364, the Defendant, even if borrowing money from the victim C and the victim D, did not have the intent or ability to repay the money on the due date of payment, and even if the said C and D performed the work, did not have the intent or ability to pay the labor cost paid by the building owner to the victims, and all were willing to use the money for gambling, with the intent to borrow money from the victims and work for the Corporation.

1. On January 10, 2015, the Defendant, at the site of the general housing construction site E, called “a lack of money to urgently purchase materials, commencing the construction work on behalf of the owner in lieu of material cost of KRW 2.6 million, and making reimbursement after three days” with the victim’s account in the name of the owner of materials around January 7, 2015; KRW 1.1 million around January 20, 2015; and KRW 5 million around February 1, 2015; and acquired the victim’s money in total by having the victim remit each remittance of KRW 2.6 million around February 1, 2015.

2. From January 27, 2015 to February 7, 2015, the Defendant concluded that the victim C will pay KRW 1.50,000 to the victim C for one day’s own repair work by telephone, and that it would pay KRW 1.50,000 to the victim C for one day’s own repair work. From January 27, 2015 to February 7, 2015, the Defendant acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount as the above “G” building’s interior repair work, and acquired and acquired property profits for the said amount as the Defendant did not pay KRW 1650,000 to the Defendant’s personnel expenses.

3. On February 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the construction site of H I located at the G site located in G, and (b) falsely concluded that “G construction works are defective; (c) KRW 800,000 is necessary to enter the construction; (d) the Defendant obtained a credit card in the name of J from the victim D to obtain approval of KRW 800,000 from the material in the trade name in the process of smuggling with the credit card; and (c) acquired and fraudulently acquired property gains equivalent to KRW 800,000 from the material in the trade name in

4...