However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 202:25, around Busan-gu, Busan-do, 276-ro 1, for the reason that he was bad before the “former 2 Public Security Center” located in 276-gil, the Defendant saw the Victim B (65) who is a food taxi driver; (b) brea the victim’s breath, twice in a breath; and (c) breath of the victim’s breath, breath of the breath; and (d) breath of the victim’s breath of the breath, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. On the same day, the Defendant: (a) was arrested at the office of “Manjin Police Station” located in Busan, Busan, the head of Busan, the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, on the same day, as the case described in paragraph (1) in the office of “Manjin Police Station” located in 111:0 Busan, the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, and was waiting as the current offender; and (b) requested C, the circumstances leading to the above police station

In doing so, “I ambucks, I am Sicks, I am Sicks,” and ambucks, I am Sicks and ambucks, and interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling and investigation of police officers by assault, such as “I ambucks” and “I ambucks.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B and C;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of a medical certificate of injury);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site photographs and CD attachment);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The case of interference with the execution of official duties in the case of the violation of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution and the case of the violation of Article 62(2) of the Act on the Grounds of the Punishment of Crimes No. 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) [the scope of recommendations] of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 62(2) of the Act on the Grounds of the Suspension of Execution and Punishment of Specific Crimes No. 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) [the scope of recommendations] of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Grounds of the Suspension of Execution and Punishment of Specific Injury (the scope of recommendations from June to April).