A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for six months, for six months, and for four months, for each of the defendants C.

, however, the defendant.

[criminal records] Defendant C was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on April 30, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on February 22, 2010.

[2] Defendant A is the actual operator of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) on the fifth fifth floor of the F building in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. Defendant B, a pro-friendly employee of the above A, is a person in charge of fund management as the adviser of G, and Defendant C is a person without a certain occupation.

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. The Defendants, at the foregoing G office around May 26, 2010, may start collecting soil and stones from the victim H at the end of June, 2010, with the permission from G to “I and 50 lots of land outside the Gyeonggi-si (hereinafter “J”) (hereinafter “J”), early six months, and late six months.

In addition, the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K and the 30 lots of land are implementing L Apartment Reconstruction Project (hereinafter “M”). The purpose of this paper is to make a false statement to “M”, “The amount of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000 in the annual contract deposit to reduce the right to operate the restaurant.”

However, in order to collect earth and stones from J land, the Defendants did not confirm or try to confirm whether to grant the approval of J land from the Ministry of National Defense, and thus, it was extremely unclear that they could collect earth and stones from J land. In relation to M, the Defendants were authorized to exercise all the tasks such as the operation of the restaurant at the construction site of apartment reconstruction project, and at the time, N corporation was engaged in consultation to be selected as L Construction and Execution Agency, Inc., a corporation, a corporation with M’s contractor, and G was only entered into a relocation service contract with N corporation or residents, and it was unlikely that both G and N M did not have been selected as the Implementation Agency, and all the Defendants operated.

G has been under the circumstances of financing operating expenses with no clear profit.