A. Parties 1) Defendant B apartment reconstruction association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”)

In order to implement a housing reconstruction project that removes the ground buildings of the Gu E unit during Ansan-si and constructs a new apartment, the Plaintiff is an association establishment promotion committee approved on April 12, 2004, and on August 24, 2007, the Plaintiff was in office as the chairperson of the establishment promotion committee of the defendant association from August 2002 to January 20, 2006, and was dismissed from the special meeting on July 20, 2013 while serving as the head of the defendant association from January 21, 2006 to July 20, 2013.

3) The Defendant Union is a stock company on June 28, 2010 (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”).

(B) The Defendant C entered into a construction contract for “G, H, and I apartment reconstruction project association apartment reconstruction project,” and Defendant C is an employee of the non-party company. (b) On July 24, 2010, among 105 members of the Plaintiff’s association, the Defendant C resolved as follows with respect to the enforcement of the rearrangement project cost, 58, opposing0, and 16 members present at the special meeting, from among 74 members of the Plaintiff’s association on July 24, 2010:

(hereinafter “instant resolution”). From August 17, 2002 to January 20, 206, the non-party company paid KRW 151,700,000 (the monthly salary 1.5 million for the chairperson of the promotion committee) for operating expenses of the promotion committee from January 21, 2006 to January 20, 2006 (the amount of KRW 159,000,000 for the president’s wages for 159,000,000 for the period from January 21, 2006 to 7, 2010 (the amount of KRW 200,000 for retirement allowances, 26,000 for business expenses, and 200,00 for bonuses (the amount of KRW 200,000 for retirement allowances, 26,000) to the Defendant association, but did not receive wages from the Defendant association and the non-party company 201.

C. The non-party company 1 under Defendant C’s lease agreement lent KRW 70 million to the Plaintiff on the pretext of moving expenses, and the Plaintiff on January 201.