beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.08 2016고단2097

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic laws (unlicensed driving) in the Daejeon District Court’s Support on January 23, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at Daejeon District Court on May 27, 2015, and on November 21, 2012, the above court violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions, including a fine of seven million won due to a violation of road traffic laws (driving driving), and a fine of two or more years of imprisonment by the Daejeon District Court on July 17, 2009.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 13, 2016, the Defendant was a person who has violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions, and the Defendant driving a motor-wheeled wheel-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul with alcohol concentration of at least 0.107% without obtaining a bicycle license for a motor device at least 4:30 times, as seen above, and driving a motor-wheeled wheel-do, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul with the alcohol concentration of at least 0.107% under the influence of alcohol during the influence of alcohol.

2. On July 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”), driving with a registered stopane around 14:30 on July 13, 2016, led to the passage of the road in front of the Seo-gu Northern-gu B at the entrance market at a op range of convenience points.

Since the location is an intersection where signal, etc. is not installed, the driver of the vehicle has the duty of care to check whether the vehicle has entered the intersection by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and to safely operate the steering direction and the brake system and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant's defendant's access to the intersection due to negligence while neglecting the above duty of care and took place at the entrance, the part of the right side of the victim's case Cenz S350 car owned by the victim's capital Co., Ltd., which took place at the room of the office.